Conservapedia: nil, Lenski: one
A week or so ago, I blogged about Richard Lenski and his long-term research into Evolution of e.coli cultures in the lab, that culminated in the evolution of a novel and beneficial trait in one of those cultures. Moreover, that evolution was reproducible from an earlier culture that had a specific mutation but did not exhibit the trait, but not from other cultures without that mutation. It’s really interesting research, and has the potential to tell us a lot about the mechanisms of evolution.
Of course, because it also, more or less as a side effect, demonstrates quite clearly that evolution happens, the creationists have been all over it, trying to discredit Lenski, his team, and anyone who has anything nice to say about his work. I’m sure there are creationists some who are approaching it at a scientific level, and trying to falsify his findings. I expect that they’ll fail, but I support their attempt. There are others, however, specifically the anti-scientific mob at Conservapedia, who have been predictably foaming at the mouth and ranting, levelling all sorts of unfounded criticisms at Lenski (he’s biased, he’s a hack, it’s a fraud or a hoax or a lie.)
Eventually, one of them got up the courage to put his money where his mouth is and challenge Lenski to defend his findings, and … well it’s worth reading it yourself.
I’m amazed that Lenski managed to reply in such a calm and dignified manner to these morons not once but repeatedly, if it were me I doubt I would have been so polite.
I know what you mean. Still I’m glad he did; his response was actually quite informative, gave me a laugh, and really helped to underscore who’s the respectable scientist, and who’s the raving idealogue (just in case one of them publishing in peer reviewed journals, and the other being a significant contributor to conservapedia didn’t give it away.)